“Follow the Money” to 2030
This post is mainly an update to the 2020-2030 timeline now that more than two years have passed since ‘the deadliest pandemic of our lifetime’ stopped the world (not for the virus, for the narrative). This also relates to the ‘cultural reset’ and the ‘control’ portions of my notes from previous posts. It’s not heavy on emotion or my take on whether this is amoral or evil – it’s more of a business plan update. They are running this out in the open like a business plan, plainly-showing us their roll-out via the shmooz-fest last month with the WEF at Davos. I review this as if simply looking at their update to the business plan towards 2030. And ‘2030’ is not my date or label (even though it’s my website title), it’s their own that comes up many times in the meeting.
For a video-summary of these updates, Neil McCoy Ward recently gave this great update on his channel. He’s in the finance/investment world. Those in that world tend to ‘follow the money’ since they are usually on the hook for correct predictions and making profits based on long-term geopolitical events – not emotions. You don’t have to agree with all Ward concludes or comments on, but the plans of the WEF members and their interviews speak for themselves.
First off, ESG.
If you are at a major corporation, and are being bombarded with ‘ESG’ training and talking-points, you are already part of this 2030 plan. As Technocracy News summarizes:
‘ESG stands for “Environmental, Social, Corporate Governance” and has been likened to a globalized Social Credit Scoring system for business. If you have a high ESG score, it will be easy to qualify for credit, to get the best deals with vendors and to participate in the global supply chain. Alas, if you don’t have a high ESG score, you won’t be in business long unless you change your behavior and knuckle under to its demands. So, how is ESG determined and who sets the rules and guidelines? First, ESG has nothing to do with the physical aspects of a company, like capital, cash flow or profit. Rather, it concerns intangible factors such as how closely you, your vendors and customers adhere to Sustainable Development and climate change policies.’
Back to Ward’s summary, the Davos meetings outline the business plan from the top down to these corporations, and how far along it already is. The planning outlined in that clip summarizes some of the targets of GFANZ (Global Financial Alliance on Net Zero), which are one-in-the same with the WEF and World Bank. The WEF is simply the sales-pitch team fronted to provide the narrative. Note that these groups set the agenda and push it from the top down. Supposedly-sovereign countries implement the legislation necessary to facilitate the goals without citizens’ input or consent (but don’t worry, you can still vote so it’s still a democracy). Citizens are with placated with ‘climate change’ goals to ensure they ‘do their part’. (Note at the start of the panel discussions, Mark Carney is introduced via ‘…you represent the UN, the World…’)
Some main points from Ward’s analysis:
Mark Carney. You know Mark, career includes 13 years at Goldman Sachs, then Canadian Dept. of Finance, then Governor of Bank of Canada, Governor of the Bank of England, Chairman of the BIS and Bilderberg Member. Luckily, he just stepped down from that in March 2020 to become the ‘UN envoy for Climate Change’. He also is on the board of Stripe, a fintech company worth $95 billion (which was a start-up funded in 2010 by Peter Theil and Elon Musk). Obviously, a natural progression making him the perfect Sustainable Development leader for the world, as far as I can see. Just as logical as a software philanthropist billionaire leading the world’s pandemic responses.
Carney: “We need an energy transformation on the scale of the industrial revolution but at the speed of the digital transformation, therefore we need a revolution in finance”. That is, a social shift that previously took decades (industrial revolution), but done in 10 years – which ties in to the 2030 goal we are already progressing towards.
Carney: “We need a new international financial system, carbon credit, and carbon offset market. We need real-world decarbonization, not the false comfort of portfolio offsets”.
So far, the WEF sees the need for $50 trillion in funds committed to action by 2050. Carney quotes $130 trillion already committed on balance sheets within the GFANZ institutions. GFANZ comprises of every bank and financial institution in the world except for two in China.
Commitments for 2030: Limit ‘emissions from portfolios’; transition clients to portfolios that meet ESG requirements. All this while ‘they’ purposely pinch off capex into oil and gas and other commodities of life, driving up prices, and passing the inflation on to the people.
Canada is yet again a test case for programs to track carbon credits and energy consumption. (‘Again’ meaning we are also currently the test case for KTDI – Known Traveller Digital Identity – for digital ID passports and travel, which is tied currently to testing the vaccine passports).
Continue the messaging – ‘you’ (the masses) need to ‘live green’ and feel guilty about your footprint, while ‘they’ continue to profit off the supply shortages they created in the first place.
The messaging of this as applied to the climate change and sustainability goals is the same as for COVID and the pseudopandemic (Iain Davis). In that the already-softened public has for more than two years been continuously conditioned via cycles of fear and illogical rules. The ‘experts’ dictate to the masses to follow any and all mandates mainly ‘for the greater good’. Those who do not obey or conform are called out as selfish and against the solution. This conditioning is simply being transferred and over-laid on the climate change narrative. “Wear your mask, stay at home, social distance, do your part or you’ll prevent us from stopping the virus”. “Buy an electric car, don’t take big selfish vacations, humans are destroying the environment, do your part or you’ll prevent us from saving the Earth”. With enough repetition this will become one in the same for the average person.
The West for the past 30 years has been made to feel guilty about being a cancer on the Earth, and so immediate action must be taken to save the planet from us. Patrick Wood of Technocracy.news once commented that a ‘deadly pandemic’ was in fact needed to whip the masses in-line since the fear of climate change was too slow and not dramatic enough. Climate change and pandemics are essentially invisible, except for the dooms-day modelling used to show ‘here’s what will happen if you don’t comply’ charts. Pandemics, however, can be used to show immediate death, even if they are inflated or exaggerated via bogus PCR testing and garbage-in-garbage-out models. The WHO and the WEF have already told us that lockdowns will be needed for more pandemics and climate ‘emergencies’, which they can declare at will. It’s no coincidence that climate change has been labelled a public health emergency too, directly and via messaging that climate change causes various illnesses. There will cease to be any perceived difference between pandemics, climate, or any other ‘emergency’. The public will just be sufficiently-conditioned to ‘do their part’ for any reason the ‘experts’ deem necessary.
The WEF pronouncements at Davos this past month parallel the WHO planning for pandemic preparedness. That is, both bodies continuously touted ‘global’ responses and plans to global issues. The WEF needs to solve climate change and sustainable development by pushing top-down policies via all international finance and banking systems. In the same way, the WHO needs to solve pandemics and health ‘emergencies’ by taking control of international responses. Both have the destruction of national sovereignty in common – the nation state, its people, its identity, all stand in the way.
I still feel the main, large-scale shift or event that will move people on to CBDC (central bank digital currency) will occur after 2025. In the interim, the BIS has maintained its stance that certain crypto currencies are still not viable (but their CBDCs will be). These aren’t 100% goals – they want to get the same >85% of the masses in the West shifted over to this system first with fear then with conveniences and relief. And it’s mainly with the younger generations in mind.
Between now and 2025 I still see them orchestrating more pandemic scares, inflation and supply chain pressure, pushing down Western nations’ citizens culturally and morally, and manipulating additional stock market and real estate market bubbles. The existing and developing programs of digital IDs (QR code passports) and government online censorship will keep expanding. (Note that same as in China, there is no difference between corporate and government censorship – they are one in the same in all countries, it’s just that the Western ones have to give the illusion of separation to placate the people).
This Davos WEF event simply shows us their status in the 2020-2030 timeline plan and where they are going. It also serves as an open message to the managerial classes – ‘here’s where the money’s going to flow, get in line for the trickle-down if you want to profit’. The managerial classes will position themselves and clients to profit and the masses will be forced to conform from levels flowing down from that. All the while the ‘do your part for the latest thing’ will ensure the people self-police their own behavior.
The Davos set publicly showcases their plan for control of the financial world top-down in the name of sustainable development. In parallel, the Bilderberg group just completed their regular meetings in the US to cover the geopolitical aspect of the same plans. Not so public – no media allowed. But I’m sure it was well-covered somehow by our free and independent press (try a google search for it).
The usual suspects were all present. Kissinger, all the major heads of the CIA, Google, Pfizer, GlaxosmithKline, and Canada’s Deputy Prime Minister, Chrystia Freeland. Big-tech, government, media, pharmaceutical, biotech, military, and other major corporations were all represented. Back in the early 2000’s the ‘Left’ would have been screaming bloody murder at this nefarious secret cabal. Now they are mesmerized by Matthew McConaughey providing government speeches on gun issues.
A good summary clip of the Bilderberg meet is provided here by Corbett and Pilato.
At the very least, the next 2-3 years of this reset will be interesting. And we still have the US election reality show to come.